The slander of REAL Christianity....something that several people here continue to do.
Rex
Rex B13
JoinedPosts by Rex B13
-
21
The WTs Biggest Deceptions
by individual ini was just wondering what do the members of this board think the biggest deception in the teaching of the watchtower society is?.
one of the biggest deceptions for me, one that stuck like a thorn in my side was their deception on earthquakes, hence my previous thread on the last days.
the wts, as i recall, published supposed proof of the increase in earthquakes since 1914. i was so angry when i found out that this was an outright lie.
-
Rex B13
-
28
Atheist debate techniques
by Rex B13 in1. intentionally twist any scripture to have less or more than it's intended meaning.. 2) ignore dispensational exgesis and time tested methods of interpretation in favor of jw style single scripture exgesis.. 3) pretend that you are above everyone else in intelligence and knowledge.. 4) pretend that your every statement is factual and there is no room for disagreement.. 5) intimidate your opponent by slander and insult.. 6) use various 'logical' terms to make yourself sound well...logical!.
7) use 'straw man' arguments and generalization to gain an edge from the beginning of the debate.. 8) pretend that science is clearly on your side and that no 'reputable scientist' would disagree with your claims.. 9) have your various allies and followers 'chime in' by attacking your opponent while you work on your response.. 10) above all, pretend that god doesn't exist and that there is no evidence beyond the physical.
make it sound reasonable to believe that all life came from nothing and totally by accident.. rex
-
Rex B13
Hi Al baby,
Like most self-described intellectuals you lack the common sense to see when you are simply being mocked. BTW, why would a multi-billion dollar organization who got rid of Johnson, Penton, Frye, Franz, Dunlap be 'scared' of a weasel like you? If you have some 'magic bullet' why not use it?
The answer is that you have only your own self-delusional arrogance. BTW, where is your sheepskin to back up your claims for knowing biology, geography, paleontolgy and physics?
Yakki Da,
Rex -
9
A Good Article I Found! Subject:Organized Religion
by Big Jim inthe truth about organized religion.
christians and theists often state that without religion people would resort to barbarism and anarchy.
in reality however some of the greatest acts of cruelty have come from organized religion, such as: .
-
Rex B13
Do you think you are breaking new ground, Jim?
1) Organized ANYTHING is hampered by our own natural depravity. Just because an organization claims to be representing Christ that does not make it so. It is the actions of that group, "you will know them because of their love for one another" in John 15.
2) The parable of the "wheat and tares" shows clearly what would happen to the followers. Bad seed is sown in with good. Now, the real 'body of Christ' has always consisted of all of the individuals who are 'saved' at any given time.
3) There is absolutely no reason to have any morals without any moral absolute to begin with. Man has more than proven that all of his works can and do become corrupt, even works that start out good!
4) Science is in continual flux, it can offer no statement valid as to the supernatural (other than the fact that other dimensions DO exist that are beyond our senses).
5) Science is just as likely to be corrupted as any other human endeavor.
6) Science has brought us to the brink of several ways to become extinct and the only thing holding back this evil is the overall influence of the Holy Spirit.
7) With the Rapture, that influence which holds back the gates of hell will be gone as the Church will be in heaven. THEN you will see just what depravity that man is capable of.
Later,
Rex -
28
Atheist debate techniques
by Rex B13 in1. intentionally twist any scripture to have less or more than it's intended meaning.. 2) ignore dispensational exgesis and time tested methods of interpretation in favor of jw style single scripture exgesis.. 3) pretend that you are above everyone else in intelligence and knowledge.. 4) pretend that your every statement is factual and there is no room for disagreement.. 5) intimidate your opponent by slander and insult.. 6) use various 'logical' terms to make yourself sound well...logical!.
7) use 'straw man' arguments and generalization to gain an edge from the beginning of the debate.. 8) pretend that science is clearly on your side and that no 'reputable scientist' would disagree with your claims.. 9) have your various allies and followers 'chime in' by attacking your opponent while you work on your response.. 10) above all, pretend that god doesn't exist and that there is no evidence beyond the physical.
make it sound reasonable to believe that all life came from nothing and totally by accident.. rex
-
Rex B13
Thanks for the input, Dedalus.
My post was part serious and part tongue-in-cheek parody of Jan's latest diatribe. Yes, I intentionally used the various methods that I lambasted in the post.
Yes, I know that there are a myriad of theories that atheists/agnostics believe as the possible origin of life.
As you can see by the answers given they do not like it one bit when they are mocked for their own arrogance and hypocrisy. Everyone is a hypocrite to one extreme or another. Some here pretend to be noble when they are anything but.
I heard about this place being a refuge for the lost from h2o. So far, it has been great fun and intellectually stimulating. Thanks again for the fine post!
Rex -
28
Atheist debate techniques
by Rex B13 in1. intentionally twist any scripture to have less or more than it's intended meaning.. 2) ignore dispensational exgesis and time tested methods of interpretation in favor of jw style single scripture exgesis.. 3) pretend that you are above everyone else in intelligence and knowledge.. 4) pretend that your every statement is factual and there is no room for disagreement.. 5) intimidate your opponent by slander and insult.. 6) use various 'logical' terms to make yourself sound well...logical!.
7) use 'straw man' arguments and generalization to gain an edge from the beginning of the debate.. 8) pretend that science is clearly on your side and that no 'reputable scientist' would disagree with your claims.. 9) have your various allies and followers 'chime in' by attacking your opponent while you work on your response.. 10) above all, pretend that god doesn't exist and that there is no evidence beyond the physical.
make it sound reasonable to believe that all life came from nothing and totally by accident.. rex
-
Rex B13
Copernincompoop,
:I’d like to read the article (in context) that Rex lifted (plagiarized?) to form his post. Does anyone know who authored it?I wrote it, on the fly, after seeing Janboy Hoaglump's usual anti-God diatribe. Don't let the slander of the riff-raff give you any false assumptions. When I post something that someone else has written it will have their name on it.
Rex -
28
Atheist debate techniques
by Rex B13 in1. intentionally twist any scripture to have less or more than it's intended meaning.. 2) ignore dispensational exgesis and time tested methods of interpretation in favor of jw style single scripture exgesis.. 3) pretend that you are above everyone else in intelligence and knowledge.. 4) pretend that your every statement is factual and there is no room for disagreement.. 5) intimidate your opponent by slander and insult.. 6) use various 'logical' terms to make yourself sound well...logical!.
7) use 'straw man' arguments and generalization to gain an edge from the beginning of the debate.. 8) pretend that science is clearly on your side and that no 'reputable scientist' would disagree with your claims.. 9) have your various allies and followers 'chime in' by attacking your opponent while you work on your response.. 10) above all, pretend that god doesn't exist and that there is no evidence beyond the physical.
make it sound reasonable to believe that all life came from nothing and totally by accident.. rex
-
Rex B13
LOL simon....excellent backslapping!
R -
28
Atheist debate techniques
by Rex B13 in1. intentionally twist any scripture to have less or more than it's intended meaning.. 2) ignore dispensational exgesis and time tested methods of interpretation in favor of jw style single scripture exgesis.. 3) pretend that you are above everyone else in intelligence and knowledge.. 4) pretend that your every statement is factual and there is no room for disagreement.. 5) intimidate your opponent by slander and insult.. 6) use various 'logical' terms to make yourself sound well...logical!.
7) use 'straw man' arguments and generalization to gain an edge from the beginning of the debate.. 8) pretend that science is clearly on your side and that no 'reputable scientist' would disagree with your claims.. 9) have your various allies and followers 'chime in' by attacking your opponent while you work on your response.. 10) above all, pretend that god doesn't exist and that there is no evidence beyond the physical.
make it sound reasonable to believe that all life came from nothing and totally by accident.. rex
-
Rex B13
Hi Al,
I guess that if I had chosen to bank my future on the unproven theory of evolution, putting my soul and the souls of all whom I influence at risk, I would be bitter also.
You are so special to the Watchtower that even your well-known apostasy hasn't gotten you df. How is that, Al baby? Are you some relative of Rutherford or do you have a rich uncle bethelite keeping your sorry butt clean?As usual, Alan, you provide endless amusement. You of all braindead agnostics have no call to complain about anyone failing to provide good arguments. Most of the time, others manage at least a response, however weak. You, however, usually don't even manage a response.
In a word, you're a hypocrite. (a favorite term here that you use to intimidate others who disagree)
Worse, you're an arrogant hypocrite. (a step up in scale of intent)
Worst of all, you're a braindead alleged intellectual arrogant hypocrite. ( a slanderous comment mean't to further intimidate)
Are these ad hominems? One not familiar with you might think so. But anyone who has had the displeasure of dealing with you for several years knows that these are simple statements of fact that can be objectively proved. (Not by you)
You have yet to respond to certain posters about providing proof for your claims (borrowed from that arch-dickhead Jan Hoagland) about the supposed massive evidence for evolution.
(Alan revels in being free from any censorship. he can now allow his true character to emerge unhindered)
The fact is you can't provide it, other than referring to the already-thoroughly-debunked Java man, and you know it. Just like you know you can't provide any more proof, or even decent evidence, for many of your claims than the Watchtower can. And so, like Watchtower officials, you spew a lot of bullshit, hoping that a few braindead supporters will give you solace by emailing you a few valueless kudos.
(Al still believes in the WTS exgesis of doctrine, as opposed to Biblical doctrine. Al rails about the WTS but they haven't given him his pink slip yet, he prefers to wear it under his trousers!)
So typical. JWs and people like you are all pups from the same old whining bitch. (A phrase that Jim Penton plagarized from Walter Martin)
AlanFruithopper
-
28
Atheist debate techniques
by Rex B13 in1. intentionally twist any scripture to have less or more than it's intended meaning.. 2) ignore dispensational exgesis and time tested methods of interpretation in favor of jw style single scripture exgesis.. 3) pretend that you are above everyone else in intelligence and knowledge.. 4) pretend that your every statement is factual and there is no room for disagreement.. 5) intimidate your opponent by slander and insult.. 6) use various 'logical' terms to make yourself sound well...logical!.
7) use 'straw man' arguments and generalization to gain an edge from the beginning of the debate.. 8) pretend that science is clearly on your side and that no 'reputable scientist' would disagree with your claims.. 9) have your various allies and followers 'chime in' by attacking your opponent while you work on your response.. 10) above all, pretend that god doesn't exist and that there is no evidence beyond the physical.
make it sound reasonable to believe that all life came from nothing and totally by accident.. rex
-
Rex B13
That's "lobotomy", Kent baby.
Does it affect one as much as having one's brain 'pickled' by alcohol and tetracycline?
Yakki Da,
Rex -
3
An open letter from a drunken Norwig
by Rex B13 inhi fellow apostraphes.....oops, apostates,.
i jest got outta dis local bar and thoiught i would psot some more of my meaningless drivel and hatred of god, who does nto exist.
i luv to castigate..no copulate with jw wimmin because i hate all that they spre... hiccup stand...for.. aheeeemmmmmm, oops, got some drool on me keyboard.. i also like to wear pink and purple tights that display my well rounded whiskey gut.
-
Rex B13
Ya know what, Jan?
If you put glasses on and grew your hair a little longer you and Kent could be....well, twins! Make sure and choose those geeky ones with black frames.
Rex -
28
Atheist debate techniques
by Rex B13 in1. intentionally twist any scripture to have less or more than it's intended meaning.. 2) ignore dispensational exgesis and time tested methods of interpretation in favor of jw style single scripture exgesis.. 3) pretend that you are above everyone else in intelligence and knowledge.. 4) pretend that your every statement is factual and there is no room for disagreement.. 5) intimidate your opponent by slander and insult.. 6) use various 'logical' terms to make yourself sound well...logical!.
7) use 'straw man' arguments and generalization to gain an edge from the beginning of the debate.. 8) pretend that science is clearly on your side and that no 'reputable scientist' would disagree with your claims.. 9) have your various allies and followers 'chime in' by attacking your opponent while you work on your response.. 10) above all, pretend that god doesn't exist and that there is no evidence beyond the physical.
make it sound reasonable to believe that all life came from nothing and totally by accident.. rex
-
Rex B13
1. Intentionally twist any scripture to have less or more than it's intended meaning.
2) Ignore dispensational exgesis and time tested methods of interpretation in favor of JW style single scripture exgesis.
3) Pretend that you are above everyone else in intelligence and knowledge.
4) Pretend that your every statement is factual and there is no room for disagreement.
5) Intimidate your opponent by slander and insult.
6) Use various 'logical' terms to make yourself sound well...logical!
7) Use 'straw man' arguments and generalization to gain an edge from the beginning of the debate.
8) Pretend that science is clearly on your side and that no 'reputable scientist' would disagree with your claims.
9) Have your various allies and followers 'chime in' by attacking your opponent while you work on your response.
10) Above all, pretend that God doesn't exist and that there is no evidence beyond the physical. Make it sound reasonable to believe that all life came from nothing and totally by accident.
Rex